Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanolathe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Nanolathe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, crufty article about a fictional technology in a computer game. I can find nothing in reliable secondary sources to indicate that this is notable, and it's already covered in sufficient detail at Total Annihilation. Reyk YO!  08:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   13:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Satellizer   (´ ･ ω ･ `)  00:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Same situation as Articles for deletion/Commander (Total Annihilation)—fictional construct with no out-of-universe coverage/import. Doesn't look like it's used in the main article, so I wouldn't even recommend a redirect. – czar   00:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Could not find any coverage.Pincrete (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, fancruft.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.