Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nao Kudo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Nao Kudo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There seems to be a stable article on ja.wikipedia, but none of the text here claims notability by en.wikipedia standards. Technically meets the db-person standard for speedy deletion, but I'm not proposing that. I am proposing deletion unless some claim of notability is written in English and sourced, even if to a Japanese-language source. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Since Wikipedia is not really cleanup, I think this nomination should be closed. I left the nominator a note on his talk page with an alternative idea. - Mgm|(talk) 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that (1) I can't find evidence that she's notable (probably because I can't read Japanese), and (2) the article doesn't present even a statement that she's notable. I suspect she is, but unless someone provides the evidence, it should go.  Perhaps a better translation of the ja.wikipedia article would provide some evidence of notability.  As I said in the nomination, it presently satisfies the db-person criterion for deletion.  Translators are blocked here at work, so I can't look at the google or yahoo translation of the ja. page to see if that has evidence of notability.
 * So I'm not requesting cleanup. I'm requesting deletion unless some evidence of notability is found.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - @MacGyverMagic: No, don't put it on a user talk page, put it here, so we can all see and debate it. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I mentioned it here, so anyone interested could look it up. - Mgm|(talk) 01:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  02:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  04:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable. If it turns out that she becomes notable, the article can be recreated. Tankin' up valuble room... Proxy User (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleting would take up additional room because the deletion would also need to be recorded along with the deleted history. -Mgm|(talk) 01:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment How many times does this have to be relisted before being closed as no consensus? Fg2 (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. If no argument in favor of keeping the article is presented, it probably should be deleted.  MacGyverMagic has made comments, but presented no arguments.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability via reliable sources. If someone finds good reliable sources, the article can be re-created. Raven1977 (talk) 00:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No third-party reference sources have been forthcoming, so it's hard to see any evidence of notability here. As the nominator says, the article as it stands basically comes under "db-person" criteria for speedy deletion. --DAJF (talk) 00:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.