Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Duguid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Naomi Duguid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable author I+delete+things+alot (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep She and her husband seem to have adequate coverage in independent reliable sources to meet WP:BIO, not an easy thing for cookbook writers. The sources seem to have been barely taped by the article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#Before nominating: checks and alternatives: B2 is there for a reason --Bejnar (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * What is the signifcance of her husband? I+delete+things+alot (talk) 05:48, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Her now ex-husband was lead co-author on her first six books. they have shared every aspect of a book’s creation, from writing and recipe collecting to photography. For years, this unorthodox MO confounded their editors at such publications as Bon Appétit and Food & Wine. Their unified voice means that the reader never knows whether an anecdote comes from Alford or Duguid. But somehow it works. A marriage of true minds admits no impediment. --Bejnar (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep she is fairly notable and merging to her X who was her cowriting partner on many books doesn't seem appropriate. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: her work is notable. The James Beard Award helps to show this. Andrew Dalby 19:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep based on having sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. The James Beard award is also significant.  Bearian (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.