Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naomi Eilan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Unanimous keep decision. (non-admin closure)   scope_creep Talk  09:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Naomi Eilan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As far as I can tell, the closest thing to notability is that she was the president of European Society of Philosophy and Psychology, which I doubt is a significant enough society to meet WP:NACADEMIC #7. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Xurizuri (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Stunning pass of WP:Prof on GS citations in a very low cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC).
 * Keep. As well as the above, there are enough book reviews for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep appears to exceed requirements on citations for academic notability. Star   Mississippi  03:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Vaco98 (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Obviously. Cabrils (talk) 21:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.