Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napier Partnership Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Napier Partnership Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 20:30, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC)




 * The only significant coverage cited in the article is the company profile, which is a primary source, and it isn't clear that the league tables are sufficient evidence of notability. A search via Google doesn't find much that could be used in the article - the main sources of information I can find are from its own website and from Marketing Week Marketplace, which seems to consist of press releases and not independent coverage. FeaturesExec also seems to be a press release. Peter&#160;E.&#160;James (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.