Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon Wells


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Napoleon Wells

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NPROF. Easily the first time I've seen RateMyProfessors.com used as a reference. – Ploni (talk) 23:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Psychology,  and United States of America. Ploni (talk) 23:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This article strikes me as being basically built on original research and primary sources. We really should not be using a universities own publication list of disserations to source when someone received their disseration. Nothing here indicates the subject is notable as either a writer or as an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.