Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Napoleon in Europe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Napoleon in Europe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I'm not seeing notability here. Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;chat] 02:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs some serious work (NPOV, references, refactoring) but it seems notable enough. I've never heard of it but it seems like a fair number of people have .--Carbon Rodney 07:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Any idea of a less confusing title? I thought it was going to be a biographical article, comparable to "Napoleon on Elba" or "Napoleon on St Helena".  Nyttend (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment The BGG page has a few external links. I can't tell if the reviews (one in English, two in in Italian) are from RSes or not.  .  Hobit (talk) 14:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Comment Should definitely be renamed to Napoleon in Europe (game) to avoid ambiguity, per Nyttend. SteveStrummer (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 19:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment – is Richard Moore, the editor of the Napoleonic Guide web site, considered a reliable source? If so, his review can be used for an additional citation to satisfy WP:GNG. He says he is a professional journalist, so that should be sufficient. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.