Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naqus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Naqus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no content, not verifiable. The  Arsenal   Fan  08:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - It always had content, albeit minimal. It now has more content and two refs. Easily done. I suggest it was WP:BITEy and inappropriate to AfD this article 29 minutes after its creation by a new editor, with no apparent effort to improve it. See WP:BEFORE. PamD (talk) 09:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article now seems appropriately sourced. Jonathanwallace (talk) 10:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep yes content, yes verifiable. -- Y not? 17:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.