Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naranjo Museum of Natural History


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  10:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Naranjo Museum of Natural History

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet GNG. This "museum" of 56 items is the personal collection of one individual. The only ref is a hyper-local small town newspaper. MB 00:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Museums and libraries and Texas. MB 00:31, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I expanded it. Sourcing remains slightly thin, but I think it meets WP:ORG. Star   Mississippi  01:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Between coverage of the museum and its founder WP:GNG is met and there is adequate sourcing to create a decent article, even if short. Wikipedia should not pedantically list every dinosaur bone or exhibit at the museum (dino fans can be sometimes  prone to excessive enthusiasm). --Animalparty! (talk) 02:18, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per arguments by --Animalparty! and Star Mississippi. Just because the page is thin does not mean that it should be deleted. There are many stub pages on here and this page is no different from that. Historyday01 (talk) 13:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per AnimalParty!. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 20:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Star Mississippi and AnimalParty!. ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 03:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.