Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naraparaju Ramchander Rao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Naraparaju Ramchander Rao

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced article that reads like promo for this politician The Banner talk 16:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Now meets WP:POLITICIAN#1 as a member of the Telangana Legislative Council. Though the article could do with a thorough rewrite - it was fairly obviously written in support of the subject's candidacy, and the only thing saving it now is that his election was announced last week. PWilkinson (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:44, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete All Politicians do not meet [Wikipedia:BLP|BLP]]. This article does not qualify BLP marginally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dormantos (talk • contribs) 12:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales (almost every one a "strong delete") on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, per WP:POLITICIAN all state assembly members are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:POLITICIAN; agree with Peter above that it does need some fixing up, however. Keri (talk) 11:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.