Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narayana Verlag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Narayana Verlag

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject does not meet the notability requirements for organizations and companies WP:NCORP, because there is no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources for this publisher. It has two sources: The about page of the subject is not independent, and the article in the Badische Zeitung is an interview with the owners of the company, who make unsubstantiated claims about the efficacy of homeopathy. It is therefor not a reliable source. Additionally, it is part of a small cluster of related subjects that are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedic article; Draft:Homeopathy for Acutes and Emergencies and Draft:Radhey Shyam Pareek that have similar problems. Homeopathy for Acutes and Emergencies has been rejected as contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Radhey Shyam Pareek has been declined twice because it does not show significant coverage of the subject. Vexations (talk) 22:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Poor sourcing.   scope_creep Talk  23:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hard to find information and sources on account of being a publisher and most sources being in German. The only reasonable source I found was this one, which has a paragraph about the publisher.  Passing mention in questionable source here. A few other passing mentions. Otherwise, doesn't meet WP:GNG although I will update my vote if sources are identified by folks more knowledgeable about German media. Suriname0 (talk) 05:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.