Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narayanganj Club Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Narayanganj Club Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks WP:GNG  Jen yir e2  11:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To consider the improvements in the context of the nomination. No prejudice to this being closed inside 7 days from this relist if a consensus quickly forms.
 * Delete fails WP:ORG RationalPuff (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep- The article has been improved since nomination; it was nominated soon after being created and I can understand why it was nominated looking at the original version of the article. Some context: The club is located in the 6th Largest City in Bangladesh, with a population of more than 2 million, and is almost a hundred years older than Bangladesh. The article passes GNG for that I refer to these two articles; নারায়ণগঞ্জ ক্লাবে আর্থিক অনিয়ম? (Published by Prothom Alo) and নারায়ণগঞ্জ ক্লাবের ১২৫ বছর পূর্তি উপলক্ষে আনন্দ র‌্যালি (published by Bangla Tribune). The articles are in-depth and published in reliable sources. I would request the nominator to review the new sources added to the article and reconsider.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per -Hasan (talk) 07:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Majority of the references are mere mentions and not significant, reliable sources. As per above, fails WP:ORG --Whiteguru (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment- If the vote is for deletion will the closing admin consider making it into a draft. I would like to work on it further.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.