Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narcis Tacau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Narcis Tacau

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article was discussed at WP:BLPN. The subject appears to lack independent notability and the article attracts WP:BLPCRIME issues. It's been stubbed; in its prior state, it was borderline eligible for G10 and indeed G10-tagged by (the tag was removed by, who took the article to BLPN). Consensus on that noticeboard, which I concur with, is that the article is not appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Vaticidalprophet 02:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet 02:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet 02:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. <b style="color:black">Vaticidal</b><b style="color:#66023C">prophet</b> 02:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Version of the article prior to being stubbed. It should be noted that the SCMP article is just a reprint of a Guardian story. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, and please G10 before this AfD runs its course. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Please do not delete this article – I have added additional detail as well as links to a number of articles about Narcis Tacau from national and international media sources. He has independent notability and this article is now clearly appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Please remove this article from the AFD list. MMc (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If he is not notable except for being accused of a crime, then the article violates WP:BLPCRIME. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete violates WP:BLPCRIME and public figure is an extraordinary exception which they do not meet. There is neither evidence they meet the definition on-wiki nor are a multitude of sources covering the matter.Slywriter (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - originally written like an attack page - G10; and does not seem to meet notability criteria for a biographic article. Netherzone (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.