Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narciso García-Loygorri, 2nd Duke of Vistahermosa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Narciso García-Loygorri, 2nd Duke of Vistahermosa

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Limited to no coverage in reliable sources, which would fail WP:NBIO. Only found a passing mention here and some potentially useful material here. I could not find anything else, however, which is unfortunate as this would still fail WP:NBIO.  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Spain.  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep As a Senator he is an easy pass of WP:NPOL. Sources found here. Mccapra (talk) 22:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. A person who is listed in a country's national biographical dictionary (Diccionario Biográfico electrónico (DB~e) de la Real Academia de la Historia) is presumed to be notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Royalty and nobility.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: This entry in the Diccionario biográfico español, which is quite in-depth, should be sufficient to demonstrate notability. The search query "Duque de Vistahermosa" seems to show additional sources which may be of value to anyone trying to improve the article. Curbon7 (talk) 02:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.