Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narcissistic nationalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Narcissistic nationalism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Likely failing GNG as undocumented "phenomenon". Not sure how this is "recent". Narcistic nationalism strikes me like a pleonasm that may have been propagated by main stream media to make a point. Are there any academic discussions about this? If not, this article should be deleted. I don't see any difference between recent events as described and e.g. Japanese or Korean protectionism in the 19th century, 1930s/1940s Europe, North Korea since the war or Ba'athist Iraq. All of which are actually far more narcissistic or nationalistic.pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:59, 11 June 2017 (UTC) pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 12:59, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 13:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG as a coherent subject. There are a couple of books that define it differently than it's current passing usage. Appears to be nothing more that an occasionally-used label lacking a consistent definition.- MrX 13:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism unsupported by any kind of evidence.  Fails the notability test.  Also fails the 'does this even exist' test.  --Lockley (talk) 06:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NEO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced original essay about a non-notable neologism. Carrite (talk) 02:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NEO, WP:GNG, and appears also fail WP:OR or WP:SOAP - GretLomborg (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.