Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naree


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 16:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Naree

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. No reliable sources, all sources consist of sales sites for the book. No GHits/GNews hits. Promotional. Approved via AfC, possibly by meatpuppet (see ANI discussion). GregJackP  Boomer!   00:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Existing sources are promotional or don't mention the book. Zero news and book hits on this (although plenty on people and other things with the same name). Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   09:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, a notable and controversial book:  (search for Nari). --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Send back to AfC per sources found by Vejvančický, so the article can be worked on more. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   15:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I can support that.  GregJackP   Boomer!   18:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found by Vejvančický. Disagree it needs to be sent through the extra bureaucratic overhead of AfC, either we think it's notable or delete. Content issues can be worked out by editors. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 19:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

 *Keep per above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin DavidEllis simply votes the same at mulitple AfDs . eg, , , , , . LibStar (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Kudos to Vejvančický for identifying those reliable sources. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.