Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narendra Gurjar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes   talk  14:36, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Narendra Gurjar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Andrew Base (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Andrew Base (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Andrew Base (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - as per nom, clearly fails wp:gng. Bollymine (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - cannot fail wp:gng because the sources are reliable and most famous newspapers of india. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:9AB:40D1:A837:D79D:83:2470 (talk) 12:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - meets WP:gng and WP:NPOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:40F0:334E:1FE2:BA06:8089:5511 (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Allow - the page should be allowed as i have provided enough citations and references for my article.Sameer.golu (talk) 13:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete it's rife with promo and no indication this individual is notable. The handful of YouTube videos are worthless as sources and the rest are run of the mill announcements. Praxidicae (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - I have heard of the said guy in political circles. He can be allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:3017:45AF:94ED:1DC3:7DD3:52E8 (talk) 14:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Pass - Follows wp:ngn. It should get published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:129B:BCA7:E580:79BB:5AA4:61B8 (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * ’’’Speedy Keep’’’ - This Wiki article follows the GNG criteria — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.67.7.156 (talk) 14:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Genuine - article is genuine with enough links to verify — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.211.52.80 (talk) 14:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I have semi-protected this AfD for four days in response to excessive IP hopping and sockpuppetry. Please note that AfD is not a vote and that mere popularity and majority does not rule; comments should explain why the page should be kept or deleted, referencing policy as needed, and decisions are made through consensus, not voting. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 15:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a mess. Fails GNG something fierce, no proper refs... six youtube videos and a handful of fairly irrelevant announcements/press releases do not a wikipedia article make. -- a they/them &#124; argue &#124; contribs 00:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. The subject is the mayor (or equivalent) of a town of 45,684 people per the latest census, assuming the poorly sourced references are true. Bearian (talk) 18:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Subject of article lacks significant coverage in reliable press. The presence of Sock-puppets in this AFD shows you one or more contributors to the creation of this article are  WP:NOTHERE to build encyclopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 17:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fail WP:GNG, nothing meet notability.- Nahal (T) 09:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.