Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nargis (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as withdrawn by nominator. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Nargis (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No news or notable information found in google news / google / newspapers regarding 'Nargis' MemonBhai (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep her native language is Urdu, by googling her name I found her interview with BBC, which I added the source to article. The title of interview is "Who is Nargis" in Urdu language in BBC. I think she clearly notable actress.Abtehas98 (talk) 17:18, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

You are wrong her native language is punjabi you are confusing nargis, nargis fakhri and nargis actress , this article of nargis is for stage dancer and only one article isn't enough to show her notable there are 1000's of actress here who have one article but they are not yet on wikipedia. Kindly provide other references as well one article isn't enough the filmogrpahy isn't even notable none of her film has media coverage.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 17:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep the nomination is not very convincing. The subject easily passes WP:GNG per given citations. Also a quick search yielded these articles 1 2 3. samee  converse  09:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:47, 14 September 2019 (UTC)


 * weak Keep It is fair so say that there is currently an issue with the sourcing. However the limited sourcing provided seems to suggest notability and that current content is essentially correct. It is probably also fair to assume that sufficient sources exist in Urdu, so it just needs somebody speaking the language and having access to them. Tagging it for source/reference improvement should be sufficient for now, i.e. no need for a deletion.--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:27, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Theek hain i have fixed it can i close this AFD Tag now ? seems like article is fixed.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.