Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narniaism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 00:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Narniaism
Neologism, self promotion, no google hits, borderline spam. Bachrach44 00:25, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gazpacho 00:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. for all the reasons listed above --Melaen 00:33, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Alhutch 01:24, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam User:Ejrrjs says What? 01:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam. (Bjorn Tipling 07:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete, no further comments necessary. Daniel Case 14:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Cactus.man   &#9997;  15:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with all the above -- SusanLarson (User Talk, New talk, Contribs) 15:02, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 20:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising, NN, Spam. Olorin28 20:24, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why Keep when you can Delete? Croat Canuck 02:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef neologism. - Mgm|(talk) 10:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.