Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article consist of copyvio info from nmims.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greencottonmouth123 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Please give the exact links for the violations. Amartyabag   TALK2ME  15:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 21.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly needs a bit of rewriting, but appears to be a degree-awarding institution and is therefore notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Without the provision of more precise links it is not possible to assess the extent of any copyvio. Meanwhile, this is clearly a notable University. The way forward is cleaning up and rewriting as appropriate not to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a deemed university which would seem to indicate that it part of the upper tier of universoty education in India. Coverage like this, and this are not difficult to find and generally reinfoce that this is a top tier educational institution.  This represents the significant coverage needed to establish notability.  With respect to the copyvio, I've gone through and chopped out all of the copying I found.  The article could use a good copyedit or there may be a better version in the history but the article history is a mess of revisions and I don't feel up to teh task of wading through it right now. -- Whpq (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It seems that this article can stand itself as an independent Article and has the potentially to be a C-Rated Article if it get an proper dricetion in editing and Expanding.Akshay b patil (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.