Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto Complete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 20:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Naruto Complete

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously deleted, as it's a compendium of existing articles, which is pointless and a GFDL problem due to lack of contributor history. And can someone do something about the user recreating it? SamBC 03:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as GFDL violation (due to lack of edit histories of the articles the content is copied from). Salt the page and warn the user not to create such a page again, especially since the intro to the article can be construed as a threat that he's going to keep on recreating the article if it's deleted. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt, per NeoChaosX. Resolute 04:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * (Speedy) Delete and Salt, per above. That'll do. ZZ 04:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt, per all reasons above. Lord Sesshomaru
 * Speedy Delete and Salt NeoChaosX says it all really. Iain99 08:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt also warn the author about recreating pages that violate GFDL. Wildthing61476 13:21, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt - Pointless compendium of info already found on other articles. Delted and recreated, with a personal message in the opening from the only major editor. Get rid of it. -- Ghost Stalker (Got a present for ya! | Mission Log) 13:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.