Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto Forums


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Forums
Contested prod. Non-notable discussion forums for the website Narutofan (whose article has been deleted and namesapce salted) which fails WP:WEB guidelines of notability. Proposed to be merged with the main Naruto article, but as I argued on the article's talk page, there's nothing in the article that's relevant to the series. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 04:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Sdedeo (tips) 04:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ]  04:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing worth merging. wikipediatrix 04:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet web notability guidelines. Merging would create problems with spam. --Kunzite 05:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Are we sure the forum hasn't been mentioned by a secondary source? NarutoFan and its forum are a very controversial site due to how Tazmo sells fansubs for profit. So it may have been mentioned by a news source. Xuanwu 05:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The burden of proof generally falls on the those advocating to keep an article. However, there's nothing in Lexis Nexis on it.  --Kunzite 21:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The burden of proof generally falls on the those advocating to keep an article. However, there's nothing in Lexis Nexis on it.  --Kunzite 21:14, 25 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 06:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB, and there's nothing mergeable. --Core des at talk! 07:56, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If necessary, a link could be added to Naruto, but that's it. J I P  | Talk 09:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Naruto. JASpencer 21:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: vanity/spam as per Narutofan. I don't care how many registered (and not necessarily unique or active) members an internet forum has and if I did I could find out by just going there, along with most of the other information in the article. Shiroi Hane 22:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: There seems to be no evidence of secondary sources. Xuanwu 19:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.