Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto Shippuden: Legends: Akatsuki Rising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep. Trolling. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 05:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Naruto Shippuden: Legends: Akatsuki Rising

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I created by mistakes, I should need to deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserX Y Found (talk • contribs)
 * Keep That's not a valid deletion reason. The article has existed on Wikipedia for 9 years, with contributions from many other users. You are not its owner. The game exists (or existed) and received reviews in mainstream gaming journals, so it appears to pass the criteria for inclusion. Also, since the original article was created by, we have only your word for it that you are the same person. (And, incidentally, since Deepak Raj was blocked in 2013, the creation of this new account appears to be a case of sock puppetry for the purpose of block evasion.)  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep Original article version is not that of the original by far, and once you contributed, it became unrevocable per Creative Commons and the GFDL, which you see on every edit page. No issue with this article as-is, and the SOCK issue should be dealt with properly.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The game got 15 reviews, proving it's notable. Neocorelight (Talk) 01:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * This is my user name User:Deepak Raj at the XY Foundation. UserX Y Found (talk) 03:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.