Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Naruto video games. The Bushranger One ping only 19:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:ball, Game is "slated for release" next year. Notability is not established. The Determinator  p  t  c  03:36, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - While it is generally bad form to create such a short article on an upcoming game in an established series (the info could go in the series article), the announcement by a major publisher means that the announcement is verified, and the game likely to be notable, so deletion is inappropriate despite the release still a far distance away. At worst, merging to the series article would be best. --M ASEM (t) 14:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Calathan (talk) 18:58, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge for now to List of Naruto video games. While I did find several hits confirming that it will be released, correct me if I'm wrong but, there doesn't seem to be much actual information about the game yet to create a decent article. All we have are announcements, but lots of them. Perhaps when more information has been released then it can be split off. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:20, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as per WP:TOOSOON. (I don't read Japanese, the language of the sole source.) Stuartyeates (talk) 10:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.