Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto ninja clothing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete... but please, for the love of Peat Moss, don't say "cruft" in deletion discussions. People, real people, edit and write articles and it's pointlessly mean to use derogatory terms. - brenneman  10:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Naruto ninja clothing
This article was tagged db-nonsense, but it is not patent nonsense. Listing here for discussion. No vote. Chick Bowen 02:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

merge Claidheamohmor 03:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete/Merge informative, could include the info on the character pages "this character is usually seen wearing xx, a sign of their membership in yy" or something, but as it is it seems rather a waste -- febtalk 03:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fancruft, per WP:NOT. JuJube 03:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge to one of the endless Naruto related articles. WP:ILIKEIT is not a reason to keep.  -Haemo 03:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Lets be kind and give it a redirect to Naruto, but not worth keeping like it is now. Mathmo Talk 05:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per JuJube. Useless fancruft that doesn't have much in terms of real-world significance. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 05:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge & Redirect: Not bad for a first article (you used punctuation marks, which is better than some people) :) I think the info. could be replicated in an existing article, and this topic redirected to it. ◄ Zahakiel ►  05:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Descriptions of clothes that appear in the show is too trivial to even appear in the main article, unless clothing is a major plot point in the show or if the show is famous for its clothing design. Would be more reasonable if each character bio included descriptions of clothes they wear instead of having a separate list. Saligron 11:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as unreferenced Ignoring "fancruft" comments (since fancruft isn't actually part of any policy or guideline) the article appears to be entirely unreferenced. Delete unless independent published references can be provided within the article. Dugwiki 20:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.