Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naseel Voici


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Missvain (talk) 01:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Naseel Voici

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is clear consensus that articles written by the subject do not count as evidence of notability for that person themselves. Despite the plethora of sources cited, none of them actually show significant coverage of Voici. My WP:BEFORE didn't show anything that would indicate a WP:GNG pass.

This autobiography doesn't seem to pass any of the 4 criteria at WP:NJOURNALIST either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete An autobiography that is clearly promotional, and I also could not find any independent reliable sources on the subject. Aspening (talk) 16:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, WP:BEFORE does not show significant claim, fails WP:NJOURNALIST CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as stated above, he does fail all of WP:NJOURNALIST. What a shame also, since the article cites two RS (Not including the one he works at), with one being based in another country.  But all four parts of WP:NJOURNALIST are failed, so 0 notability on Wikipedia. Elijahandskip (talk) 19:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete There were two ways this could be probably notable. One by qualifying WP:BASIC or WP:GNG by having substantial coverage about him finding and running the media outlets that he has. Second by having any noteworthy stories or work as a journalist. None of those are happening. Hence delete. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I have not found any significant coverage about the subject. For me it's a clear WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST fail. Less Unless (talk) 20:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, and the obvious COI issues are problematic.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not found any significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNALIST. Powerful Karma (talk) 03:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.