Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nashawn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 02:30, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Nashawn
This rapper asserts some notability, but I couldn't find much on google and as it is it fails WP:MUSIC. Delete unless someone can provide more evidence of notability. Grandmasterka 02:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's not much more evidence to provide, Grandmasterka. Royboycrashfan 02:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This guy and his lyrics are all over google but it would be nice if someone found the highest chart position of his work Ruby 02:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Allmusic.com doesn't know him which suggests he hasn't charted as it has entries on all charting musicians. Has appeared on Nas albums as they are apparently cousins but doesn't seem to be notable enough to warrant his own article. Capitalistroadster 03:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreate. The crystal ball can't say whether this artist will be notable, either by himself or as part of Nas's outfit, but I would support recreating the article with new substantiated information if it is warranted in the future. --Kinu 03:44, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with Endomion, 25k + hits on google. Need to be expanded a bit with how he charted Senner 03:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you look at the results, most of them are obiously irrelevant. Many of them refer to Nashawn Kearse. Grandmasterka 05:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per Kinu. If he happens to have success in the future (which seems unlikely to me), then recreate the article. Otherwise, he's not notable enough. - Chairman S. 04:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, not even close to WP:MUSIC ++Deiz 12:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Prodego  talk  14:27, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Jaranda wat's sup 16:59, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Eusebeus 18:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 18:50 2006-02-05
 * Delete as above.Blnguyen 05:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Wingsandsword 08:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Pierremenard 08:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- S iva1979 Talk to me  09:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.