Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasuverse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, recreated as redirect to Kinoko Nasu. Sandstein 08:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Nasuverse

 * — (View AfD)

fancruft. Original Research. Tueid 17:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Myneu 20:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep No policy or guideline has been presented to justify deletion. Discussion initiator uses a newly registered account and has already nominated another article for deletion (see Ero guro). Vandalism, maybe? - Cyrus XIII 23:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Check again. No original research is policy. Find another reason to keep. --Kunzite 00:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete or weak merge to sub section of Kinoko Nasu. It does not belong at this name space.  It's a Neologism.  The term isn't well used and gets very few hits on google. The main text of the article needs to be re-written. It's unsourced and it's got a lot of plottiness which is likely a rehash of content in the series main articles.  --Kunzite 00:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kinoko Nasu. No matter what the nominator's intent, this article is heavy on original research and light on reliable sources. Some of it could be merged over, but Kunzite is right about the WP:WAF problems. -- Satori Son 16:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and unverifiable through reliable sources. The term is also a neologism. --TheFarix (Talk) 14:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.