Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NatWest Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to One Day International. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

NatWest Series

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The NatWest Series was just a sponsor name for the One Day International matches played in England. Unlike what the article is trying to say, there was no links between the different year's matches, and so we don't need an article listing all the matches in series under the same sponsor name. This is a case of sponsorship rather than it being a genuine recurring event like the Cricket World Cup or The Ashes. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   18:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and England. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment If this is deleted then the title should redirect somewhere - as a long running widely publicised event name it's clearly a plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to or Merge with One Day International. It's a plausible enough search term that it should lead somewhere. JMB1980 (talk) 18:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge with One Day International.  // Timothy :: talk  08:17, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge I would agree that a separate article is not needed, but as noted it is a plausible search term and thus a redirect makes sense.Dunarc (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.