Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nat Benchley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  16:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Nat Benchley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There's nothing particularly convincing for WP:CREATIVE, WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG, my searches have found nothing particularly convincing aside from these links but none of them actually insinuate any solid coverage (searches at News, Highbeam and News Archive found nothing). SwisterTwister  talk  07:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article mentions The Washington Post, so I checked there first.  There's quite a lot of coverage, really:, , , , , , .  I'm having a bit of trouble locating good sources from outside Washington, DC, but there's  from NPR.   The article needs cleanup, but I think there's enough coverage to at least make this debatable.  If he made it onto NPR, I think there's a fair chance that there are offline sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Per NinjaRobotPirate's analysis. there are good sources. did you do any WP:BEFORE checks at all? ThePlatypusofDoom  (Talk) 20:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.