Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalac Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Natalac Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Record label and fails WP:GNG as there are no reliable sources that cover it in-depth. Listed artists may also be non-notable (some are listed as "incarcerated, probation, or deceased"). CNMall41 (talk) 03:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep These Wikipedia Pages since previously has been on for 10 years, but after 10 years later demoted to User Draft because of improper format and lack of references" Now some references have been added.... I believe as a artist grows so do their enemies...Yameka (talk) 08:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No significant coverage from reliable sources.  I note that the MTV site used as a reference for several statements is user-generated.  And the prlog.com site is just that -- a repository for press releases.  None of these references are independent of the subject organization.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of the current article and coverage is convincing enough for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of evidence of notability. Guy (Help!) 09:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.