Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natali Del Conte


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Nakon 05:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Natali Del Conte

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Just an ordinary journalist, not amazingly notable, no major awards Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 05:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not meet WP:BIO at this stage. No WP:RS reliable sources. Given that the podcast TeXtra is not around I doubt the host would pass notability requirements. I understand she is moving on to mainstream tv this year, and if she does so, a delete now should not hinder a fully referenced article being written in the future if she does meet BIO. --Breno talk 10:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless more reliable sources can be provided. (The only one I'd say meets WP:RS at the moment is ) Notability has not been demonstrated. Terraxos (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep because she has built a strong following in a short amount of time and as mentioned above is moving on to maintstream tv. The awards will come later.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.20.236 (talk) 07:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Has proven herself to be above an "ordinary" journalist, with a recent promotion to CNET TV, a highly visible technology-themed television channel. Awards are soon to follow. Notability is being demonstrated on a day-by-day basis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.9.176 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment -- can we add Template:Natali Del Conte to the nomination? Jfire (talk) 08:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And delete both article and template. The references put forward so far do not demonstrate notability per WP:BIO. Jfire (talk) 21:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Transhumanist (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete She is a non-notable journalist. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Breno. WP:BIO lists this set of criteria for creative professionals, including journalists:
 * The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by their peers or successors.
 * The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
 * The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
 * The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries, museums or internationally significant libraries.
 * Sorry, the subject doesn't these hurdles. Perhaps at a future date she will, at which time she will merit an articleMajoreditor (talk) 13:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject is now a senior editor with cnet and will be presenting tv segments on Fox News, more noteworthy than many other articles on wikipedia, if someone doubts the validity of this latter statement please say so and I shall willingly provide evidence of that fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olorin001 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I doubt that Natali Del Conte is notable, pls advise how she is so? merely being on television does not make you notable. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ  Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 23:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Keep Significant internet writer. Perhaps the entry is a little long, but she certainly meets the qualifications for notability. She has plenty of appearances and writing, including several articles in WIRED. 208.54.15.104 (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – The San Francisco Chronicle and PC Magazine as noted here . Also CNET as shown here . Shoessss |  Chat  21:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the SF.com link does not seem to link to a published article, but rather to a blog / and I don't even see the poster Jessica Guynn in their list of regular contributors, on the PC magazine list, she contributes a tip and CNET is the place where she will work. Delete for not enough independent coverage on her form reliable sources.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.