Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Zeta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 22:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Natalia Zeta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The main reason for notability cited in the article (streaking at a football match) is sourced to Blogspot. WTF? Also fails GNG, ENT and N, but stikk, WTF?.Blogspot????? Spartaz Humbug! 19:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:51, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete the article because it's not notable really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forest90 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacking non-trivial coverage by reliable secondary sources, this performer fails both WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. Sex worker gets a brief news mention for a morals incident/publicity stunt falls under WP:DOGBITESMAN. The article lacks good sources, and a GNews search yields two-sentence mentions of this person in relation to the flashing incident. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Well if you want an alternative source, there is . That said, I don't see how an accurate and complete biography can be constructed here, given .  Apparently Wikipedia has been wrong for quite a number of years, the person is a private individual, and (as is so often the case) this was yet another fake identity with another fake name. Uncle G (talk) 21:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:ENT and any rs coverage is WP:BLP1E thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT Westmanurbe (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Masum Reza 📞 10:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT Westmanurbe (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Masum Reza 📞 10:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.