Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Reid (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Natalie Reid
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

She doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. This Natalie Reid does not seem to be connected to the person whose article was deleted at AfD previously. Boleyn (talk) 19:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:30, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: The article from The National that I added as a reference is just about enough to provide basic verification, but other than that I am just seeing candidature notices which fall short of the WP:POLITICIAN criteria. Nor does her party position seem sufficient to provide automatic notability without wider coverage in her own right. AllyD (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I did consider a redirect to Scottish Socialist Party, where she is not discussed but her name is listed in the infobox along with other key people. I decided against it as the name isn't uncommon (as the last AfD of a different Natalie Reid shows), and there are mentions on Wikipedia of Natalie Desselle-Reid and Natalie Reid, wife of Ed Reid - I just felt a redirect left potential for confusion, and a dab probably wasn't needed. Boleyn (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being media spokesperson for, or chair of, a small political party is not an automatic inclusion freebie under WP:NPOL — it would be enough if she could be sourced over WP:GNG for it, but it is not a freebie that entitles her to keep an article that's parked on just one source in which she's the bylined author and not the subject. Bearcat (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.