Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Teeger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Monk characters. ✗ plicit  11:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Natalie Teeger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A super WP:FANCRUFTy article, with no reception/analysis of the character, just a lengthy plot summary and a ton of WP:OR trivia (ex. "Compared to Sharona, Natalie has driven at least six different cars in the course of the series. How she can afford to switch cars so frequently, given her very low salary, is never explained", followed by a detailed description of her cars...). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, just some mentions on a plot summary here and there, mostly in the numerous Monk-universe guide book (the series was clearly quite popular at some point, but that popularity did not translate into any WP:SIGCOV-level study of this supporting character). A redirect to List of Monk characters should be more than sufficient. PS. Previously PRODed. User:BD2412 deprodded with a comment that a merge and redirec to List of Monk characters would be better. Then this was redirected by an anon, but restored due 'no merge done'. Well, I don't believe there is anything to merge, given it's a plot summary referenced to the TV series and nothing else. I am fine with WP:SOFTDELETE redirect preserving the history. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * REDIRECT to the list of characters of the TV series, no evidence of any notability. Fancruft in extremis!TheLongTone (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect with no prejudice against expanding in the future if reliable, secondary sources are used to show enough notability to justify its own article. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 14:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * 'Redirect per above. Rlink2 (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Enforce redirect per Piotrus' previous events. It's not his job to do the merge; anyone can do that. Jclemens (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.