Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Walker (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Prey (2009 film). Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Natalie Walker (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO per lack of coverage on page and in my search. Could maybe meet WP:NACTOR #1 (though doesn't appear likely) but I'll note a precedent per this AfD that an NACTOR pass may still fail BIO (see Otr500's comment). QuietHere (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia. QuietHere (talk) 11:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Alternatively see the precedent set here that passing NACTOR is good enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirct to Prey as it appears that is the only significant role in a notable production that she has. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete or Redirect: The subject might just scrape through with WP:NACTOR, if one counts her role in the movie, Prey, and her recurring roles in Wicked Science and Winners & Losers—but still, it's debatable. However, in terms of sources, I've only found this. There are other articles online which I believe refer to a different actress named Natalie Walker—although I'm happy to be corrected there. I think a Redirect to Prey is a fair outcome, but otherwise, I just don't think there's enough here to justify an article—unless, of course, there are other sources relating to the subject which I've missed. (Please note that I have not taken into account any of the alleged precedents referred to above—mainly because I don't view them as precedents, but merely the opinions of other editors, valid though they may be.) Dflaw4 (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, maybe "precedent" wasn't the right word. I was just moreso wanting to be upfront about my agreeance with that AfD's arguments and closing decision to get across that they should apply here as well so I didn't get a bunch of NACTOR-only keep votes again. QuietHere (talk) 13:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand what you mean, QuietHere, and I certainly didn't mean my comment to appear critical. I just wanted to make clear that my vote was not influenced by either of the two AfDs referred to above. I should note, though, that the AfD for Patrick Wilson is currently the subject of a Deletion Review. Thanks, Dflaw4 (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I wasn't taking it as critical at all, just felt I should clarify my intent. And thanks for letting me know about that review, I was not informed of it so I guess I'll have to give that a look. QuietHere (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I'm not seeing much coverage about her and I'm not even sure her role in the Prey film warranted much critical attention. Oaktree b (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.