Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Zfat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Natalie Zfat

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Bringing this to AfD as a PROD is likely to be contested. No real notability established. Seems to be an attempt at self-promotion. Nymf talk/contr. 01:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral at this point, leaning toward Delete . All the sources in the article currently are first party sources, and there seems to be a lack of significant coverage in independant, reliable sources.  As such, as I currently see it, it fails the General Notability Guideline.  However, if someone can produce some independant, reliable sources to establish notability, I'll consider a keep vote. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 01:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing to Delete: After searching through the references, including those recently added by the primary author, and searching through google results, I can find nothing to indicate significant coverage of the subject of the article. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 00:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:GNG from what ;ittle I can't find.  Turgan Talk 02:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Primary author has added independent references 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 15. Poisonivyjones (talk) 04:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete simply penning articles about famous people does not make you notable. coverage has to be about the article subject to be considered in depth coverage. no in depth coverage LibStar (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a common mistake people make here.  If I write up a bunch of articles about famous people, that does not, in turn, make me famous.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 23:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to also have issue with WP:COI, Jeepday (talk) 23:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.