Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nataliey Bitature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus was that this has achieved notability. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Nataliey Bitature

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While accomplished, and there are some brief mentions of her in a couple of articles, the only in-depth coverage of her is from the eagle.co.ug site, and I can't find their editorial policy, so unsure if it is a reliable source.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * World Bank also featured Nataliey Bitature;https://blogs.worldbank.org/team/nataliey-bitature User: Edith Violet Naisubi
 * Keep - Further to link on World Bank blog from Edith Violet Naisubi, individual meets GNG as both World Bank and World Economic Forum recognise accomplishments. Here is one of three links from World Economic Forum, which critically ends discussion on GNG once and for all, but pushes up need to improve the article: https://www.weforum.org/press/2016/05/africa-s-top-women-innovators-take-the-stage-in-kigali/ --Simone2049 07:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I have improved the article and added several citations. Based on the current state of the article, Bitature passes WP:GNG for "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Lonehexagon (talk) 23:58, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 04:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.