Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natascha Bessez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Natascha Bessez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Her teen pageant win is not good enough for an article. Is the music activity notable (not my area). Legacypac (talk) 10:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: She was the runner-up in Denmark's most popular music competition.  { [ ( jjj     1238 ) ] }   14:01, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ssт✈(discuss) 16:46, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per point 9 of WP:NMG. She placed 2nd at the Danish Melodi Grand Prix.  Wes Mouse  &#10002;  12:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't believe that WP:MUSBIO #9 Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition. refers to the Dansk Melodi Grand Prix which is simply Denmark's preliminary round for the Eurovision Song Contest, which is a major music competition.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Her teen pageant win would not be enough, but her music and acting have resulted in significant coverage. Jacona (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:MUSBIO, Dansk Melodi Grand Prix is simply Denmark's preliminary round for the Eurovision Song Contest. --Bejnar (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. While I'm not an expert I'd say that national qualifiers for Eurovision count as "major music competitions" and thus WP:NMG is met. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per point 9 of WP:NMG as pointed out by Wesley Mouse! --MurderByDeletionism"bang!" 07:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —azuki (talk · contribs · email) 11:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close. Consensus above was clear and the non-admin relist is just timewasting. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * two delete votes negates a speedy close. Insulting the judgement of editors who are not Admins is not cool. Admins make lots of errors User:Neelix Meg McGuffin and we can go on. Legacypac (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, you've already gone on and on and on this general subject. The fact that some admins make bad decisions doesn't immunize bad non-admin actions from criticism, nor should it. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - for pageantry and music career. WP:GNG applies. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources support a claim of notability based on the scope and breadth of her accomplishments. Alansohn (talk) 09:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.