Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Bauman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Natasha Bauman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think this person meets the WP:BIO notability standard as an author, as an actor, or as both combined. Nadda in Google News  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. We've been trying to get rid of this one for a while now, but the process got hung up when the original prod tag was vandalized.  The sole claim to fame for this person is that she's published a book with Putnam, which is certainly a legitimate and notable press, but the problem is that the book itself is not notable in the least, completely failing WP:BK.  The article thus fails WP:RS & WP:BIO as well.  The article is the work of a particularly assiduous WP:single-purpose account, which has continued to add material to it throughout all of the notability tagging, but without improving the WP:N.  The article actually should have been speedied, but perhaps an admin will happen by and close it out on a WP:SNOW. Qworty (talk) 04:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - What's really strange too is that the semi-cited work, Karezza does not seem to mention her at all. Not really sure it was supposed to do so, though.  -Seidenstud (talk) 05:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not a reference wrt. Natasha Bauman but about the subject of her novel, I feel. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not appear to be a notable author. Gsearch turns up 83 unique hits, of which most seem to be from booksellers' (Amazon, B&N) sites and precious little else. Not to be confused with her namesake, the M*A*S*H actress. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Simply not enough there to make an article of. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 07:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.