Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Japanwala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —  The Earwig   talk 20:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Natasha Japanwala

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unfortunately it appears there is almost no secondary source coverage of the subject, thus failing GNG and NPERSON. As there are instances of writing by the subject, it may be a case of TOOSOON but does not currently meet the notability threshold. Innisfree987 (talk) 07:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom + it just sounds like someone's resumé. LeBron4 (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing does not rise to the level of passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.