Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Laws Mick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Natasha Laws Mick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Natasha Laws Mick fails wp:notability. Her only movie credits are as extras or as the star of what appears to be a U-tube series with only 81 views. There appears to be no online press discussing her as an actress. D kriegls ( talk to me! ) 05:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep even the most famous of actors and actresses have started as an extra. She has contributed to her career through various roles and is on the rise. An actual actress, not just some reality show star. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.41.202 (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete being on the rise isnt reason to keep as this would fall under WP:TOOSOON, as she isnt noteable yet it would be a defintie WP:NOTE both reasons for deletion Amortias (T)(C) 13:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of references added and plenty of search engine results can be found online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.45.41.202 (talk) 15:36, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * delete there is no suitable evidence of notability, desperate adding of inconsequential links that fail Citing sources is not going to help. It shouldn't stop re-creation if the person later meets notability. — billinghurst  sDrewth  03:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.