Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Tamika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Natasha Tamika
Prod tag removed by possible sockpuppet: User:Jes Liloleme (talk • contribs). Article on an "adult" actress. Playboy Coed of the Week is not considered notable under Notability (pornographic actors) guidelines. Google hits for ("Natasha Tamika" -Wikipedia) = 369. No listing on Internet Adult Film Database. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  08:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  Delete. [comment removed due to WP:LIVING -- Femmina 09:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable--Mertens21/FrodoTBagins/DonkeyPunch21/Squirrel 09:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delelte per nom and above (with a smile for the cute manner in which the notability issue is dealt with on the article itself). BigHaz 09:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, a lot of notable porn actors and models, have been deleted on AfD recently, in my opinion (I have high standards for notability, though). However, this model is not even close. -- Kjkolb 11:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article even (bizarrely) includes the sentence, "Although Natasha may not be considered notable to the general population of those who frequent Wikipedia, for those whose interest is in glamour models, a Wikipedia entry on her is invaluable." Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The authors can't even spell "unvaluable"... &mdash; Haeleth Talk 14:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, non-notable adult actress (WP:BIO also applies), and the article is self-referential. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 16:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Just to remove any ambiguity in the close: delete for being an insufficiently famous "actress."  Additionally, the article could be speedied under the "attempt to communicate" (with Wikipedia).  Never mind that, though: another lady in her birthday suit.  Geogre 21:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.