Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Vojinovich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Article also needs expansion based on new sources added to article, so tagged. 18:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Natasha Vojinovich

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

absolutely no Google hits whatsoever; dubious source - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Disclaimer: MY work ISP does not allow access to the resource, claiming it is blocked due to "adult content". - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment FYI, it's a SFW b&w fashion photo of her, no caption but her name. --Dhartung | Talk 22:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G3 as hoax, so tagged. Seems it was tagged for speedy before but declined. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete There is one decent source now (the name was spelled wrong). However, I can't find any other sources, so it seems she's not quite notable yet. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant media coverage Addhoc (talk) 22:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Substantial coverage in reliable sources. Mostlyharmless (talk) 01:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.