Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate James (fighter)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nate James (fighter)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG as his main coverage is through routine sporting report. James is in his 40s, has not fought in 7 years. Very unlikely to meet GNG in the future. WP:CRYSTALBALL  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 18:52, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Can't find any significant coverage and we're unlikely to see any in the near future. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. I'm not sure he even meets WP:NMMA since Strikeforce Challengers was a offshoot TV promotion for "young and upcoming" fighters. Papaursa (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.