Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Ramin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-08 09:25Z

Nate Ramin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject fails WP:BIO. Looks very much like a vanity article. --Infrangible 01:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Usually I don't like sourcing a Google search, but when I searched for the title of the book "Loyola University Chicago IL 2007 (Off the Record)" I got twenty returns, 17 of them looked like they were selling it and two were reviews at sites I'd never heard of (the last was Answers.com). Writing a book is something not everyone has done, but it isn't notable unless it gets some notice from other authors or known reviewers. Anynobody 02:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. per Anynobody. That this book actually exists appears to be the extent of Mr. Ramin's claims to notability.  Mwelch 02:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Aagtbdfoua 03:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are 500+ results when you search for "loyala.university.chicago.off.the.record" which judging by the cover is a more correct title, but it's still just a NN college selection guide, part of the College Prowler series. I don't think the individual titles are notable, much less the individual annual editions or their (co-)authors. --Dhartung | Talk 12:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Corndogs are pretty damn good though. --Bongwarrior 04:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.