Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Rothacker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Trainwreck (band). As a valid alternative to deletion given the consensus that this subject is not notable. (non-admin closure) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:50, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Nate Rothacker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Passing mentions of the subject do not lead to WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Trainwreck - Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Google search gave me sources:, , , , , all of which qualify as passing mentions and does not demonstrate notability. -- Ashley yoursmile!  05:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails WP:GNG, fails WP:MUSICBIO. I don't think a redirect is appropriate. Trainwreck was a "side project of a side project" of Jack Black fronted by an "almost famous actor" backed by "whatever guys could form a rhythm section in any given city in which a show was scheduled." No one's coming to WP looking for the drummer. They're finding the drummer because he's linked from Trainwreck. (And probably finding Trainwreck the same way.) Redirects are used to help people arrive more quickly at the page they want to read. A redirect here won't do that. Yappy2bhere (talk) 09:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete a drummer who does not meet our notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Trainwreck (band): Searching agress with the above conclusion. Redirect per ATD-R.  The redirection target contains a substantial amount of information about the subject, so a redirect here is more than appropriate. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 10:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.