Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Boët


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  Unsourced bio. None of the sources in the article tie this person to the specific activities and appearances alleged. This is G10 material, as there's nothing "possibly negative" about alleging porn appearances when the subject has filed an OTRS ticket to request deletion. Jclemens (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Nathalie Boët

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject requests deletion (2009032810011861).

Personal thoughts: Unsouced possibly negative BLP ("pornographic model") with no real claim to notability. BJ Talk 08:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Unsourced for two years, problematic article, borderline notability.  Enigma msg  08:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Relatively notable, has articles on both the German and French versions of Wikipedia. --dicttrshp (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. The French version (here) cites a source by ISBN number, which I could not actually read, but is a book by her, not a book about her.  The German version (here) is effectively unsourced (which isn't unusual on the German wikipedia, by the way; they have a very different attitude to BLP than we do).  The ISBN numbers in the German version are also of books by her, not books about her. I think there are insufficient reliable sources about her to justify keeping this article.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  00:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep modest notability per movies, books. JJL (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I've found two articles about her and a book that discusses her: . That;'s enough to meet WP:BIO. DGG (talk) 00:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Weak claim of notability, and unsourced,  fails WP:BLP and WP:PORNBIO. -- J mundo 03:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.