Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie Van Raemdonck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Nathalie Van Raemdonck

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PhD candidate with 3 papers is far from meeting WP:NPROF, and a few interviews isn't really enough to meet WP:GNG. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The interviews give her some notability, but not quite enough it seems. Delete per nomination and other comments. X-Editor (talk) 18:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the current sourcing does not establish GNG. Vikram Vincent 18:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — per nom. Ajshul  😃 18:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The "interviews" are just her providing background information and her opinion on particular platforms; they are not nearly numerous enough to satisfy C7 and are not in-depth coverage of her. JoelleJay (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not found for this doctoral student. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC).
 * Delete. way, way WP:TOOSOON, see her GS. --hroest 01:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. PhD candidates are usually not yet notable — in unusual cases people can become notable for scholarly accomplishments made while they were a PhD student, but by the time those accomplishments become recognized, they're generally no longer a student. And in this case we don't even have any hint that her student accomplishments are yet on track to become notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG  Devoke  water  13:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely TOOSOON, given she hasn't even gotten her PhD yet; NPROF is not met. --Kbabej (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing even remotely close to making this hater of her political opponents and advocate of destroying the freedom of speech notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * AfD is not an outlet for your personal political opinions, please keep your politics out of here. --hroest 13:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.