Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan "Jetti" Blair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Nathan "Jetti" Blair

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of WP:notability. No significant coverage in independent WP:reliable sources noq (talk) 11:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article fails to clarify how his career is significant and is also vague such as the "A-list stars" he has worked with. Honestly, this is nearly entirely promotional from mentioning his comedy talk show to his CEO position to his MTV/2 & Spike TV spots, there isn't one reliable source to support all of this. I'm having a rough time searching for sources as it seems he has different names, "Nathan Jetti Blair", "Jetti Ayo", etc. Considering how promotional this is, I wouldn't be surprised if this is a conflict of interest. SwisterTwister   talk  20:10, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Sources and correct info coming, This should be under "Jetti (entertainer)" not either of the current headers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.35.171 (talk) 12:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

*Keep -Jetti is a well known beatboxer and artist, there are hundreds of other artists who are nowhere near his notability on wikipedia who deserve to be here less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.35.171 (talk) 12:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Duplicate vote to above. Please note WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no reason that this article should. noq (talk) 13:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I suggest adding the sources soon because this debate runs for a limited amount of time and please also make sure the sources are reliable and third-party. SwisterTwister   talk  20:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete, notability has not been demonstrated/evidenced.  PK T (alk)  18:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, relies on self-published and primary sources.—Baldy Bill (talk) 21:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage found. Nothing else found that would suggest an article is appropriate. --Michig (talk) 10:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.